Two Theories Of Leadership And Comparison Free-Samples for Students

Question: Choose two theories of Leadership as listed in the Study Schedule above, and compare and contrast these in terms of how they contribute to your understanding of leading. Answer: Introduction: Situational leadership and trait theory of leadership are two important leadership theories. The effectiveness of the application of these two theories is plausible in the business world. Behavioural trait is important for both but the prime influence of the leadership is getting emerged from external reality for situational leadership and from the internal characteristics for trait theory (Northouse, 2012). The personality of the leader cast a magic spell over the leadership quality. The demand of the situation invites the flexibility of the leadership in case of the situational leadership. Goal orientation is indispensible in both of the cases but the in case of the situational leadership the visionary character of the leader is important. The leader need to offer effective guidance to the follower that is the reason the leader himself does bare the responsibility of the leaded people that is the reason he must possess a personality that is different from other (Selznick, 2011). Th e behavioural trait of the leader is very important to judge the quality of the leadership that he does offers to the group. Leader used to poses an authoritative attitude top motivate and inculcate the team member. But different leadership theory has defined different types of authoritative attitude of the leaders. Effectiveness of the authority is one of the major aspects that used to get measure to evaluate the quality of the leader and his leadership. Two theories of leadership and comparison: Situational leadership theory and trait theory of leadership are two theories related with leadership. These two theories are harbouring contradictory point of view regarding leadership (Wheatley, 2011). Situational leadership summary: Situational leadership developed on the basis of the demand of the situation task behaviour is important for the situational leaders. The relationships with all the socio economic factors are equally important here. Situational theory of leadership Trait theory of leadership This leadership is not fix it used to get change according to the situation. This leadership is situational dependent leadership (Goleman etal.,2013). This is the goal driven leadership need to address the situational demand. High level problem solving capacity. Context based leadership. Clear vision is one of the major traits of this type of leadership (Aaker Joachimsthaler, 2012). Put stress on personal characteristics Leader and followers are getting compare Believes in the inborn leadership quality Characteristic centric leadership Must have the achievement drive of leadership. Charisma, creativity and flexibility in leadership. Psychological leadership of leadership High level of self confidence. Honesty integrity and trustworthiness in character. Emotional maturity of the leader. Contrast of the two theories: Situational leadership is depending on the external influence that is situation for its application. It can be said this leadership is the situation driven leadership. The leaders are flexible in this case. They can adopt any policy that can serve the situational purpose. In this type of leadership practice the leader need to be object driven and he must harbour a clear vision of aim or the goal of the leadership (DePree, 2011). Trait theory is based on the external factor that is the quality or the attribute of the leader. This leadership theory believes that the leader must harbour some character trait that can help him at the time of the leadership. This leadership theory put stress on the personal character of the individual as leader rather the demand of the situation (Spillane, 2012). Example of two leaders: The example of situational leader: John Davison Rockefeller Sr. was a stallward in American oil industry at the same time he become popular as philanthropist. He got manifested as the richest person in American history. He is the leader; started his carrier as a book keeper. The initial business involvement of this leader in the domain of food business, from that he made a jump to the business of oil refinery. The growth and the development of him become phenomenal in nature (Nahavandi, 2016). During the phase of his development Rockefeller came across harsh competition he needed to interact with the contenders from the different part of the country different community. The interactions with contenders were successful for him (Jackson Parry, 2011). His organisation Standard Oil Company acquired many of the contenders. The leadership decision of Rockefeller used get change on the demand of the situation. The process of horizontal integration was the part of the strategy of Rockefelle r. The strategy was aggressive enough that is the reason he has to face law suit in different time because the practice of his organisation lead towards monopoly. The organisation harbours ambition to establish reign over the oil market of the country. As the leader Rockefeller faced different types of allegation due the legal infringement. In order to define the nature of the leadership of Rockefeller it is important to focus certain character trait of the leader. After study the character of this leader one can find the ideal character of a situational leader (Ward, 2016). Shuttle mentality or the shrewdness of the character is one of the significance of the personality of this leader. Winning attitude of the leader is getting represented by the shrewdness of the leader. The character of the situational, leader is the leader need to object driven and sure regarding the goal of the endeavour he suppose to be adamant to achieve the goal that character is getting reflected in the behaviour of Rockefeller. The reputation development is one of the major intentions of the endeavour that has been committed by Rockefeller, because as the leader he used to look at the broader spectrum and the sustainability (Hargreaves Fink, 2012). That attitude is traceable to the situational leaders. The issue of sustainability is one of the hunting issues for the leaders of contemporary period. That has been realised by Rockefeller that is the reason he was moving ahead of time. Public reputation of the leader is one of the factors that strengthen the possibility of the sus tainability. The visionary attitude is one of the major character trait of the situational leader sustainability is one of the issue that can get envisaged by the situational leader. The concept of corporate CSR has been envisaged by Rockefeller. Offering support to the society is the part of the sustainability strategy of Rockefeller. That is another attitude of the visionary leader who can think for long term achievement. When a business is taking from the society it is the important duty for that organisation to pay back to the society. Rockefeller took attempt in this regard (Daft, 2014). Courage is one of the significance of situational relationship. The situational, leader need to address the demand of the situation with courage. That quality got reflected in the leadership behaviour of Rockefeller. As the leader he demonstrated his courage in the different situations. Te clear vision regarding the target of the mission empowered the leadership quality of Rockefeller (DuBrin, 2015). Example of the trait leader: Richard Bronson is one of the leading contemporary business personalities of world. The owner of brand Virgin has established his name as one of the leading business leader as well as philanthropist. The group created by him is controller of 400 companies in all over the world. The success in the financial domain has made him one of the richest business icons in the country as well as in all over the world. The quality of the leadership is one of the significant traits of Richard Branson the leader can be treated as a trait leader in this regard. The leadership traits of Richard Bronson are following (Beck Cowan, 2014), As a leader Bronson describe himself as the rule barker. The innovative approach of the leadership is one of his significance as the leader. This is one of the character traits of the trait leader. Trait leader must have the high level of confidence. That has been reflected in the character of Richard Bronson. The theory of trait leadership believe that the great leader always born but not make (Kellerman, 2012). It is not possible to make the leader but the born leader always harbours certain attribute to become a great leader. It has been traced in the life of Richard Bronson. The quality of the personality of Bronson is one of the significance of his leadership process. The sociability of his character represents the quality of the trait leader in this regard. Bronson is an achievement oriented leader. He is focus on the target he supposes to achieve the approach of his leadership move towards that direction .Delegation is another great quality a leader can have that poses by Bron son. In case of delegation does harbour some specific method. He finds out the right people from within his one organisation and trained them in a proper manner to take care of the responsibility of the specific department. In this case he works as the head of the talent acquisition team (Chhokar et al.,2013). The quality of the trait leader got manifested in honesty integrity and self confidence. That has been manifested in the character of Richard Bronson. As the leader he has earn an wider acceptance to the global population that is the reason he himself has developed a brand value as the leader. The excellence of the quality is another significance of trait leadership. That has got reflected in the character of Richer Bronson (Skowronek, 2011). He prefers to break rule to create new one that is the reason he has earn the support and credibility from the ordinary staffs of his organisation. He never remains isolated in his own cocoon rather prefer to get mingled in all the level. That is the great way of communication for the leader of the organisation. The leader needs to have the willingness to listen the others. That has been reflected in character of Bronson. He is accessible personality in the organisation that is the reason it can be said that he prefer communication and listen ot her. Hands on approach are one of the significance of the Mr. Bronson. This is one of the representation of his self confidences the leader of the organisation that is one of the prominent nature of the trait leader of any organisation (Johnston, et al.,2016). Learning from the mistake is one of the significance of the Mr. Bronson as leader. The decision making is one of the critical processes the leader of the organisation used to get judge on the basis of this. Monitoring the whole process of the decision making is one of the ways to observe the flaws in the process. Farther development can get done on this basis. Situation and the follower are two important factors in this leadership theory (Carver, 2011).. In trait theory the personal characteristic of the leader make string influence over the leadership behaviour of the leader that has been witnessed in the character of Richard Bronson. Generosity communication skill those are important for the leader that has been reflected in the character of Bronson. The focus behaviour and the attentive attitude of the leader is one of the major significance of the trait leadership (Gaines, 2012). The reason of the communication to direct all the leaded towards the attainment of a specific goal, the goal oriented behaviour always standardise the character of the leader. That is the reason the goal oriented behaviour standardise the activity of the leader that type of representation has been witnessed in the behaviour of Richard Bronson. Integrity is one of the characters of the goal driven leadership such as Richard Bronson. The issue of integrity is directly connected with team performance of the organisation. That is the reason the leader need to maintain the integrity within the team. The team can get the inspiration out of the behaviour of the leader. Passion is one of the significance of the trait leader. That representation is traceable in the behaviour of Richard Brinson. The passionate attitude of Bronson is o ne of the significance of his leadership that can inspire the team and the organisation and lead them towards the optimum goal (Briggs et al.,2012). Conclusion: From above discussion it can be said that the nature of situational and trait leadership is different but there are similarity among them. Both type leader reships are object driven. The external factors and its influence has made situational leadership more flexible in this type of leadership the leader can change is trait on the basis of the demand from the environment the external factors are the dominating force in this regard. In trait leadership the quality of the individual leader can offer significance in the leadership process (Renz, 2016). The quality of the leadership is depending up on the objective that has fix in front of the leader because passion and integrity is character of the leadership. From the perspective of the pragmatic need of the situation it can be said that situational leadership is the most suitable leadership among this two because this leadership can offer sufficient flexibility to the leader and the major target of the leader to meet the situational r equirement that is the reason the leadership skill can serve the great purpose to the team in a specific situation under this leadership. References: Aaker, D. A., Joachimsthaler, E. (2012).Brand leadership. Simon and Schuster. Beck, D. E., Cowan, C. (2014).Spiral dynamics: Mastering values, leadership and change. John Wiley Sons. Briggs, A. R., Morrison, M., Coleman, M. (2012).Research methods in educational leadership and management. Sage Publications. Carver, J. (2011).Boards that make a difference: A new design for leadership in nonprofit and public organizations(Vol. 6). John Wiley Sons. Chhokar, J. S., Brodbeck, F. C., House, R. J. (Eds.). (2013).Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. Routledge. Daft, R. L. (2014).The leadership experience. Cengage Learning. DePree, M. (2011).Leadership is an art. Crown Business. DuBrin, A. J. (2015).Leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills. Nelson Education. Gaines, K. K. (2012).Uplifting the race: Black leadership, politics, and culture in the twentieth century. UNC Press Books. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., McKee, A. (2013).Primal leadership: Unleashing the power of emotional intelligence. Harvard Business Press. Hargreaves, A., Fink, D. (2012).Sustainable leadership(Vol. 6). John Wiley Sons. Jackson, B., Parry, K. (2011).A very short fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying leadership. Sage. Johnston, M. W., Marshall, G. W. (2016).Sales force management: Leadership, innovation, technology. Routledge. Kellerman, B. (2012).The end of leadership. New York, NY: Harper Business. Nahavandi, A. (2016).The Art and Science of Leadership -Global Edition. Pearson. Northouse, P. G. (2012).Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage. Renz, D. O. (2016).The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management. John Wiley Sons. Selznick, P. (2011).Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Quid Pro Books. Skowronek, S. (2011).Presidential leadership in political time. University Press of Kansas. Spillane, J. P. (2012).Distributed leadership(Vol. 4). John Wiley Sons. Ward, J. (2016).Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership. Springer. Wheatley, M. (2011).Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world. ReadHowYouWant. com.